A real process
Show us where work gets delayed, repeated, or handed off.
Start with the constraint. Not the trend.
We map the work, measure the drag, and choose the smallest useful fix.
Start a conversationFind the bottleneck. Replace it. Improve it.
- 01Fix the expensive bottleneck first.
Start where time, errors, or lost work cost the most.
- 02Use existing software when it fits.
Set up the tools that already work. Build only what is unique.
- 03Build custom where it creates an advantage.
Reserve custom work for the parts of your process that are genuinely different.
- 04Measure what improves.
Success is less time and fewer errors—not more features.
How we evaluate a process before building anything.
- 01Identify the expensive or frustrating constraint
- 02Map what comes in
- 03Map what the team currently does
- 04Define the required output
- 05Estimate the cost of the current process
- 06Determine whether existing software fits
- 07Recommend the smallest useful fix
Stop spending expert time oncopy, paste, repeat.
Put skilled time back into customer work. Start with the repeat work that costs you most.
Process cost sheetDGC / 001
Example: manual quoting
Conservative operating estimate
- 3 people
- affected
- 5 hrs / week
- rework + entry
- $38 / hour
- loaded labor
Annual drag$0
Recover half the time:$0 / year
Before counting faster quotes, fewer errors, additional jobs handled, or the lower build cost AI makes possible.
What does manual work cost?
Estimate the recoverable labor tied up in one repeated workflow.
People × hours × rate × 50 weeks
Annual process drag$18,000
Potential annual capacity recovered$9,000
Monthly break-even ceiling$750
Directional estimate, not a magic number. We validate the assumptions before recommending a build.
Seeing a number worth fixing? Send us the process. We’ll find the smallest useful build.
Send this estimateWhat we need from your team.
The people doing the work
Include the people who know the work best.
Useful examples
Forms, spreadsheets, quotes, or screenshots let us see the work quickly.
Helpful to have on hand
- A current form or spreadsheet
- A pricing sheet
- A few real requests or notes
- The output you want
Questions we hear before a build.
Often no. Many problems are solved by setting up or connecting tools you already have. Custom is for the steps where your process is genuinely different.
AI-assisted development reduces build hours. The work still starts with your process and ends with a tool your team can use.
Yes. A focused first build is usually the best way to prove value and learn what should come next.
No. We aim to remove the friction around your tools, not force a migration you did not ask for.
Light but real involvement. Short feedback loops with the people who do the work keep the tool grounded and make adoption easier.
We test with real work, fix what the first weeks reveal, and improve the tool as the process settles in.
We compare the cost of the current process with the likely value of fixing it. If the economics do not work, we tell you.
Bring us the work still handled by hand.
We’ll find the smallest useful fix.
Start your build- Dayton roots, nationwide reach
- Reply within 24 hours
- No obligation